Q. To tackle the problem of pollution in cities, policy makers think that drastic actions like temporary use of odd-even number scheme for vehicles, closing schools, factories, construction activities, and banning the use of certain type of vehicles are a way forward. Even then the air is not clean.
Vehicles more than 15 years old. comprise one percent of the total; and taking them off the road will not make any difference. Banning certain fuels and car types arbitrarily is not proper. Diesel engines produce more PM 2.5 and less CO2 than petrol or CNG engines. On the other hand, both diesel and CNG engines produce more NO, than petrol engines. No one has measured the amount of NOx that CNG engines are emitting. Arbitrary bans on vehicles that have passed mandated fitness tests and periodic pollution tests are unfair. What is needed is the scientific and reliable information about the source of pollutants on a continuing basis and the technologies that will work to reduce pollution from them.
Q. Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical and rational implication conveyed by the passage?ย
(a)ย Arbitrary curbs on vehicles to reduce pollution are difficult to implement.
(b) Knee-jerk reactions cannot solve the problem of pollution but an evidence-based approach will be more effective.
(c) A heavy penalty should be enforced on those driving without periodic pollution tests.
(d) In the absence of laws to deal with the problems of pollution, the administration tends to make arbitrary decisions.
Question from UPSC Prelims 2023 CSAT
Model Answer:
Q1: Correct Answer – (b) Knee-jerk reactions cannot solve the problem of pollution but an evidence-based approach will be more effective.
Explanation –ย
The passage discusses the inefficiency of drastic measures like temporary use of odd-even number scheme for vehicles, closing schools, factories, construction activities, and banning the use of certain type of vehicles in tackling pollution. It argues that such measures are arbitrary and do not make a significant difference. Instead, it suggests that what is needed is scientific and reliable information about the source of pollutants and the technologies that can reduce pollution. This implies that an evidence-based approach would be more effective in addressing the problem of pollution. Therefore, option (b) is the most logical and rational implication conveyed by the passage.