Q. pH value of 0.1N HCl solution is approximately:
a) 10 b) 11 c) 1 d) 2 Correct Answer :
Question from BPSC PT 71, 2025
Correct Answer: c) 1
Explanation: – HCl is a strong, monoprotic acid, so it dissociates completely: [H+] = concentration of HCl. – For a monoprotic acid, Normality = Molarity. Thus, 0.1 N HCl = 0.1 M HCl. – pH = −log10[H+] = −log10(0.1) = 1. – Therefore, the pH is approximately 1.
Q. Which one of the following subjects fall within the jurisdiction of both High Court and Supreme Court?
a) Protection of fundamental rights b) Dispute among States c) Dispute between Centre and State d) Protection from the violation of the constitution Correct Answer : a) Protection of fundamental rights
Question from BPSC PT 71, 2025
Correct Answer: a) Protection of fundamental rights
Explanation: – Both the Supreme Court (Article 32) and High Courts (Article 226) can be directly approached to enforce Fundamental Rights by issuing writs. Hence, protection of fundamental rights falls within the jurisdiction of both. – Disputes among States or between the Centre and a State fall under the Supreme Court’s exclusive original jurisdiction (Article 131), not the High Courts. – “Protection from the violation of the Constitution” is not a specific head of jurisdiction; while courts can review constitutionality of laws, the clear concurrent jurisdiction of both courts is specifically for enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
a) It is not mandatory to mention the reasons in this motion b) It is different from the No-confidence motion c) It is not different from No-confidence motion d) Permission of the House is not essential to present it Correct Answer: b) It is different from the No-confidence motion
Question from BPSC PT 71, 2025
Correct Answer: b) It is different from the No-confidence motion
Explanation: – A censure motion is moved to express strong disapproval of a specific policy or action, and it must state the reasons. Hence option (a) is incorrect. – It differs from a no-confidence motion, which need not state reasons and is aimed at testing whether the Council of Ministers enjoys the confidence of the House. Thus option (b) is correct, and option (c) is incorrect. – Note: A censure motion does not require “leave of the House” (support of 50 members) like a no-confidence motion; it is taken up if admitted by the Speaker. However, the key accurate statement among the options is that it is different from a no-confidence motion.
a) To increase people’s political awareness b) To increase employment c) To increase agriculture production d) To enable people to participate in development administration Correct Answer : d)
Question from BPSC PT 71, 2025
Correct Answer: d) To enable people to participate in development administration
Explanation: – Panchayati Raj is a system of democratic decentralization meant to bring governance to the grassroots level. – Its main objective is to involve local people in planning, decision-making, and implementation of development programs in their own areas. – While increased political awareness, employment, or agricultural output can be indirect benefits, the core purpose is people’s participation in development administration, as reinforced by the 73rd Constitutional Amendment which institutionalized Panchayati Raj in India.
Q. The Atmanirbhar Bharat Scheme announced by the Government helps in:
1) Enhancing India’s manufacturing capabilities and exports across the industries 2) Incentivizing foreign investments for domestic production Out of these : a) 1 is correct b) 2 is correct c) Both 1 and 2 are correct d) Neither 1 nor 2 is correct Correct Answer :
Question from BPSC PT 71, 2025
Correct Answer: c) Both 1 and 2 are correct
Explanation: – The Aatmanirbhar Bharat initiative (including the Production Linked Incentive schemes) is aimed at boosting India’s manufacturing capabilities and export competitiveness across multiple sectors (electronics, pharma, autos, textiles, etc.). Hence, statement 1 is correct. – These schemes provide incentives tied to domestic production, encouraging both domestic and foreign companies to invest and manufacture in India. Thus, it also incentivizes foreign investment for domestic production. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
Q. Who is empowered to review financial position of the Panchayats?
a) Chairman of District Council b) Chairman of Block Committee c) Chief Minister d) Finance Commission constituted by the Governor Correct Answer : d) Finance Commission constituted by the Governor
Question from BPSC PT 71, 2025
Correct Answer: d) Finance Commission constituted by the Governor
Explanation: – Under Article 243-I of the Constitution (73rd Amendment), the Governor of a state must constitute a State Finance Commission every five years to review the financial position of the Panchayats. – This Commission recommends how to distribute taxes, fees, and grants between the state and Panchayats and suggests measures to improve their finances. – The Chief Minister or chairpersons of District/Block bodies do not have this constitutional mandate.
1) The summoning of the House means convocation 2) Prorogation ends a session 3) Dissolution terminates a House 4) Prorogation of a session can be effected by the leader of the House alone
Out of these which is not true? a) Only 2 b) 1 and 3 c) 2 and 3 d) Only 4 Correct Answer : d) Only 4
Question from BPSC PT 71, 2025
Correct Answer: d) Only 4
Explanation: – Statement 1: True. Summoning means calling the House to meet (convocation), done by the President (or Governor for a State). – Statement 2: True. Prorogation is the formal ending of a session of the House. – Statement 3: True. Dissolution terminates the life of the House (applies to the Lok Sabha/State Assembly; the Rajya Sabha is not subject to dissolution). – Statement 4: Not true. Prorogation is ordered by the President (or Governor) on the advice of the Council of Ministers, not by the Leader of the House alone.
Q. Who among the following determines the qualification which shall be requisite for appointment as member of the finance commission?
a) Parliament by act b) Council of Ministers c) President of India d) Union Cabinet Correct Answer : a) Parliament by act
Question from BPSC PT 71, 2025
Correct Answer: a) Parliament by act
Explanation: – Article 280 of the Indian Constitution provides for the Finance Commission. – It says the President appoints the Chairman and members, but “Parliament may by law determine the qualifications which shall be requisite for appointment as members of the Commission and the manner in which they shall be selected.” – These qualifications are laid down in the Finance Commission (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1951. – Therefore, Parliament (by an Act/law), not the President, Council of Ministers, or Union Cabinet, determines the required qualifications.
Q. The constitution of India provides for reasonable restrictions on Fundamental Rights but reasonableness must keep in mind that :
1) The interest of the general public is safeguarded 2) Prevailing social value and also social needs are not bar 3) Directive principles can be bypassed 4) Collective good is not greater Out of these: a) Only 4 is correct b) 2 and 3 are correct c) 1 and 2 are correct d) Only 1 is correct Correct Answer : c) 1 and 2 are correct
Question from BPSC PT 71, 2025
Correct Answer: c) 1 and 2 are correct
Explanation: – The Constitution allows “reasonable restrictions” on certain Fundamental Rights (especially under Article 19) to balance individual liberty with public interest. – While judging reasonableness, courts look at factors like the purpose of the law, the nature of the right, the extent of the restriction, and the social context.
Check each statement: 1) The interest of the general public is safeguarded — Correct. – Articles 19(2)–(6) explicitly allow restrictions in the interests of the general/public interest. The test of reasonableness balances individual rights with public welfare (V.G. Row, Chintaman Rao).
2) Prevailing social value and also social needs are not bar — Correct (read as: they are relevant and must be considered). – Courts assess reasonableness in light of prevailing social values and social needs of the time (Pathumma v. State of Kerala).
3) Directive principles can be bypassed — Incorrect. – Part III (Fundamental Rights) and Part IV (Directive Principles) must be harmonized; DPSPs cannot be ignored or “bypassed.” Restrictions are often upheld to implement DPSPs (Minerva Mills).
4) Collective good is not greater — Incorrect. – The very idea of reasonable restrictions recognizes that collective/public interest can outweigh individual liberty in appropriate cases.
Therefore, statements 1 and 2 are correct; 3 and 4 are incorrect.
Q. What is true about the proceedings of the State Legislature?
a) It can discuss the conduct of any judge of the High Court also b) Advocate General has right to vote c) Business in the legislature shall be transacted only in official language of the state or in Hindi or in English. d) Validity of proceedings shall be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity Correct Answer: c)
Question from BPSC PT 71, 2025
Correct Answer: c)
Explanation: – a) False. Article 211 of the Constitution prohibits any discussion in a State Legislature regarding the conduct of a judge of the Supreme Court or a High Court in the discharge of his duties. – b) False. The Advocate General has the right to speak and take part in the proceedings of the State Legislature (Article 177), but has no right to vote. – c) True. Article 210 provides that business in the State Legislature shall be transacted in the official language(s) of the state or in Hindi or in English. Note: the presiding officer may permit a member to speak in his mother tongue, but the general rule is as stated. – d) False. Article 212 says the validity of proceedings in the State Legislature shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.