Q. Analyse the trilogy between environmental movement, development and tribal identity.
UPSC Sociology 2024 Paper 2
Model Answer:
Environmental Movements, Development, and Tribal Identity
The trilogy of environmental movements, development, and tribal identity represents a complex interplay of social, ecological, and economic factors, particularly salient in the Indian context. This intersection highlights the tensions between conservation efforts, economic progress, and the preservation of indigenous ways of life.
Development, often driven by modernization theory, typically emphasizes economic growth and industrialization. However, it frequently conflicts with environmental conservation and traditional tribal lifestyles:
• Large-scale projects often necessitate land acquisition in tribal areas.
• This process disrupts the social fabric and cultural practices of tribal communities, undermining their identity and traditional way of life.
• The state’s development agenda often overlooks tribal rights, leading to marginalization.
Environmental movements have emerged as a form of resistance against the adverse impacts of development on both nature and tribal communities:
• The Chipko Movement of the 1970s and the Narmada Bachao Andolan exemplify how environmental activism is often rooted in the defense of livelihood and cultural identity.
• These movements underscore the concept of environmental justice, advocating for equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens.
• Sociologist Ramachandra Guha emphasizes that environmentalism in the Global South, unlike in the West, is intertwined with social justice issues, particularly those affecting indigenous populations.
Tribal identity is reinforced and asserted through participation in these movements:
• Indigenous populations strive to protect their ancestral lands and cultural heritage.
• The conflict between the state’s vision of development and the tribes’ sustainable way of life necessitates a reevaluation of what constitutes true development.
• The Dependency Theory critiques the conventional development approach, highlighting how it can perpetuate inequality.
In conclusion, this trilogy represents a dynamic interplay where each component influences and reshapes the others, emphasizing the need for inclusive and sustainable development policies.