Q. Does tribal development in India centre around two axes, those of displacement and of rehabilitation? Give your opinion.
Q. Does tribal development in India centre around two axes, those of displacement and of rehabilitation? Give your opinion.
UPSC Mains 2025 GS1 Paper
Model Answer:
While displacement and rehabilitation have historically dominated tribal development discourse in India—with tribals constituting 40% of all displaced persons despite being only 8.6% of the population—this binary framework presents an incomplete understanding of tribal development challenges and aspirations.
The Centrality of Displacement-Rehabilitation Axis:
• Development-induced displacement has affected millions through projects like Sardar Sarovar Dam (2 lakh displaced), Polavaram Project, and mining in Niyamgiri hills, creating cycles of impoverishment
• Conservation-induced displacement from tiger reserves has uprooted communities like Baigas from Kanha and Jenukurubas from Nagarhole, often without adequate compensation
• Poor rehabilitation record persists despite legal frameworks—only 25% receive proper rehabilitation; LARR Act 2013 and PESA provisions remain poorly implemented
• Loss of livelihood base occurs as forest-dependent communities lose access to minor forest produce, traditional farming lands, and cultural spaces
However, tribal development extends far beyond these two axes:
• Cultural preservation and identity: Protecting 700+ tribal languages, traditional knowledge (Baiga’s forest medicine), customary laws, and sacred sites while combating stereotyping
• Economic empowerment beyond compensation: Van Dhan Yojana for value addition, MSP for tendu leaves/mahua flowers, bamboo ownership rights under FRA 2006, skill development through DDU-GKY
• Social infrastructure access: Bridging 45% literacy gap through Eklavya schools, tackling malnutrition in 40% tribal children, sickle cell programs (affecting Gond, Bhil communities), mobile health units
• Political participation: Strengthening Fifth Schedule’s TAC provisions, implementing PESA effectively, ensuring Gram Sabha consent, promoting leadership in TSP areas covering 500+ blocks
• Rights-based approach: Forest Rights Act implementation granting 44 lakh titles, community forest rights, habitat rights for PVTGs like Bondas, Birhor
The Integrated Approach Needed:
• Participatory planning making tribals development partners, not beneficiaries
• “Development with dignity” respecting tribal worldviews (Dongria Kondh’s sacred hills)
• Economic models harmonizing with traditional lifestyles
• Technology adoption without cultural disruption
Conclusion:
Tribal development must evolve from displacement-rehabilitation focus to holistic empowerment ensuring dignity, rights, and sustainable progress.
